Website compliance for law firms

Professional-services sites are a steady ADA target sector, and law firms are a favorite precisely because the irony cuts: a firm that won't remediate after a demand letter makes an unsympathetic defendant. The barriers cited are the standard set: unlabeled contact forms, image-based attorney bios without alt text, PDF resources screen readers can't parse, navigation that traps keyboards.

The same economics apply as everywhere else: the letter is priced below the cost of a defense, and the firm's own time *is* the defense cost. The cheaper posture is knowing what an automated scan of your site finds before someone else runs one.

A prospective client typing 'I was arrested for…' or 'my employer fired me after…' into an intake form is producing exactly the kind of text session-replay tools capture keystroke by keystroke, and exactly what should never reach an ad platform via a pixel on the confirmation page. The CIPA wiretap theory behind Javier v. Assurance IQ applies with extra force when the recorded text is a legal consultation request, and bar confidentiality expectations make the optics worse than the statute.

Complidar maps which trackers and recorders run on intake and contact paths specifically. What it does not do: audit attorney-advertising rules or bar-specific marketing compliance. That's your jurisdiction's rules and your managing partner, not a scanner.